________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

However, the recent Skills England report is right: construction is facing a significant AI skills gap. But the gap isn’ t simply a lack of technical capability; it’ s a gap in confidence, clarity, and practical use cases that genuinely add value on live sites and, most importantly, the digital foundation to extract maximum benefit from this emerging technology.

From my perspective in digital transformation, AI is often talked about in abstract terms, especially given the buzz surrounding it at the moment. Its value becomes very real when we connect it directly to the industry’ s biggest operational challenges: getting people on site safely, ensuring compliance, improving productivity, and giving project leaders and site teams visibility they’ ve never had before.

These challenges appear across every level of the construction companies we work with- from commercial teams trying to evidence compliance, to site teams dealing with labour bottlenecks, through to leadership struggling to consolidate data from multiple systems. AI is becoming most valuable where construction leaders need faster decisions, validated data, and clear risk indicators. But it only works when workforce data is accurate, real-time, and verified. The industry and organisations within it must first standardise how it captures, checks and shares digital information, because AI cannot compensate for incomplete or unreliable site data, especially if it is still reliant on paper forms or basic digital forms. Without this there is a risk that AI’ s value is limited to task based, individual productivity gains, such as capturing meeting minutes and actions rather than real transformation and properly leveraging AI’ s capability in analysing and presenting back on vast amounts of data.

And we have to be honest about the pitfalls. AI is not a silver bullet. It can recommend, flag and predict- but it should never replace human judgment, particularly where worker wellbeing or legal compliance is concerned. Those skilled and experienced individuals on sites need to help determine the guard rails for the technology to ensure it is not over-relied on, and it remains a tool to support decisions and raise risks and not be the decision maker in its own right.

When implemented correctly, AI can have a measurable impact, especially in creating safer site environments. By analysing patterns around access control, incident logs, shift overlap, and high-risk activities, it can highlight where overcrowding is likely or where fatigue may be creeping in. These insights help organisations evidence their responsibilities under the BSA, CDM and wider HSE frameworks, all of which rely on

24